|
|
|
|
At the risk of alienating myself further, I feel compelled to discuss age! Now I know that no polite gentleman ever discusses a ladies age, but as I am neither a gentleman or overly polite here goes.
Now before I start, let me just say I am no fonder of the cult of youth than the next 45 year old male. Yes, I have my own teeth, a full head of hair and have yet to succumb to incontinence pants, but I am, I'm afraid, middle aged.
I consider age as one of the key criteria when choosing an escort. I must say that on the whole I do prefer ladies that could generally be considered of my 'generation' (35 to 45). This is because I have found with younger girls I cannot help feeling like a dirty old man. Also I find ladies who are in their thirties and above, are independent, and have been doing escorting for a while more interesting and interested in what they do. I think, contrary to popular view, that if you choose to do this for a living over a long period of time, you must enjoy it, at least some of the time. Certainly those ladies I visit time and time again are those that are true professionals and with whom I have the type of sex I might have with someone I have met on a one night stand and who really fancies me.
Anyway, back to the question of age. How on earth are you supposed to really understand how old an escort is? When you are told late twenties, this invariably means late thirties. Early twenties, can be thirty, teens means twenties. If you are told late thirties then who knows - the escort in question might even be in possession of a Bus Pass! And yes, occasionally, the quoted age is the correct age.
I realise as I write this that there is no real point in what I say, the world is made so that women feel they have to be ever youthful whilst we men can still embrace age with the hope of appearing distinguished! How long this will last though I do not know - sales of male moisturisers are worryingly high for those of us with wrinkles already!
|
Added on: 07/03/06 05:17
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
I have been punting fairly regularly for about 8 years, and in that time I have visited many wonderful women, and some not so wonderful, just as one might expect. Pursuing this hobby you start to develop rules of engagement which rightly or wrongly affect the way you choose who to visit and who not to visit. For me, the first factor to consider is an escorts name.
I have favourite names, which remind me of good experiences and no-go names which I discount immediately from any shorlist. Take Paris! Never, ever visit a Paris! I must have visited 4 or 5 and each time it has been disastrous. The last time was a mere 6 months ago and on finding the ladies name was Paris my bette judgement said no, leave now. But no, the state of arousal and anticipation was such that I needed my fix and Paris was duly accepted.
I don't know what it is about the name, but they are always mechanical, rushed and unfulfilling encounters. Why can this be? I have also found the same with Chelsea, Bianca, Katie or Kate, Mandy and Kim.
On the other hand, choosing an escort called Louise has resulted in an almost universally positive experience. Hollie, Suzy, Sky, Emma, and Lucy are also favourites and will sway me toward choosing an escort. Ridiculous, I know but it works for me.
Interested to know what other people use to help them choose?
|
Added on: 06/29/06 09:31
Comments (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
